Traditional Polish Christmas Eve Dinner / The 12 Dishes of Polish Christmas | Article | Culture.pl

What Is the Maximum Failed Google Login Attempts

Abstruse

From mass extinction to cell expiry, complex networked systems often exhibit abrupt dynamic transitions between desirable and undesirable states. These transitions are oft acquired past topological perturbations (such as node or link removal, or decreasing link strengths). The problem is that reversing the topological harm, namely, retrieving lost nodes or links or reinforcing weakened interactions, does not guarantee spontaneous recovery to the desired functional state. Indeed, many of the relevant systems exhibit a hysteresis phenomenon, remaining in the dysfunctional state, despite reconstructing their damaged topology. To address this challenge, nosotros develop a two-step recovery scheme: beginning, topological reconstruction to the bespeak where the organisation can be revived and then dynamic interventions to reignite the system's lost functionality. By applying this method to a range of nonlinear network dynamics, nosotros place the recoverable phase of a complex system, a state in which the arrangement can exist reignited past microscopic interventions, for instance, decision-making just a single node. Mapping the boundaries of this dynamical phase, we obtain guidelines for our two-pace recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Subscribe to Journal

Get full periodical access for 1 year

92,52 €

only 7,71 € per issue

All prices are Cyberspace prices.
VAT will exist added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Buy commodity

Go time express or total article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are Net prices.

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Acquire about institutional subscriptions

Data availability

Empirical data required for constructing the real-world networks (Microbiome, Brain, Yeast PPI, Homo PPI) are bachelor at https://github.com/hillel26/NaturePhys2021.

Lawmaking availability

All codes to reproduce, examine and ameliorate our proposed analysis are bachelor at https://github.com/hillel26/NaturePhys2021.

References

1. Van Mieghem, P. Graph Spectra for Complex Networks (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

   MATH  Google Scholar

2. Zhao, J., Li, D., Sanhedrai, H., Cohen, R. & Havlin, Southward. Spatio-temporal propagation of cascading overload failures in spatially embedded networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 10094 (2016).

   ADS  Google Scholar

3. Dobson, I., Carreras, B. A., Lynch, V. East. & Newman, D. Eastward. Complex systems assay of series of blackouts: cascading failure, critical points, and cocky-arrangement. Chaos 17, 026103 (2007).

   ADS  MATH  Google Scholar

4. Shih, H.-Y., Hsieh, T.-50. & Goldenfeld, N. Ecological collapse and the emergence of travelling waves at the onset of shear turbulence. Nat. Phys. 12, 245–248 (2016).

   Google Scholar

5. Jiang, J., Hastings, A. & Lai, Y.-C. Harnessing tipping points in complex ecological networks. J. R. Soc. Interface 16, 20190345 (2019).

   Google Scholar

6. May, R. Yard. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature 269, 471–477 (1977).

   ADS  Google Scholar

7. Cohen, R., Erez, K., Ben-Avraham, D. & Havlin, Southward. Breakup of the Internet under intentional attack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3682 (2001).

   ADS  Google Scholar

8. Schreier, H. I., Soen, Y. & Brenner, N. Exploratory adaptation in large random networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 14826 (2017).

   ADS  Google Scholar

9. Motter, A. Eastward. & Lai, Y.-C. Pour-based attacks on complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 66, 065102 (2002).

   ADS  Google Scholar

10. Crucitti, P., Latora, V. & Marchiori, M. Model for cascading failures in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Eastward 69, 045104 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar

11. Achlioptas, D., D'Souza, R. M. & Spencer, J. Explosive percolation in random networks. Science 323, 1453–1455 (2009).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar

12. Boccaletti, Southward. et al. Explosive transitions in circuitous networks construction and dynamics: percolation and synchronization. Phys. Rep. 660, 1–94 (2016).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar

13. Gao, J., Barzel, B. & Barabási, A.-L. Universal resilience patterns in circuitous networks. Nature 530, 307–312 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar

14. Cornelius, S. P., Kath, W. L. & Motter, A. East. Realistic control of network dynamics. Nat. Commun. 4, 1942 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar

15. Barzel, B. & Barabási, A.-Fifty. Network link prediction by global silencing of indirect correlations. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 720–725 (2013).

    Google Scholar

16. Harush, U. & Barzel, B. Dynamic patterns of data flow in complex networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 2181 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar

17. Hens, C., Harush, U., Cohen, R., Haber, S. & Barzel, B. Spatiotemporal propagation of signals in complex networks. Nat. Phys. 15, 403–412 (2019).

    Google Scholar

18. Barzel, B. & Biham, O. Binomial moment equations for stochastic reaction systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 150602 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar

19. Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic processes in circuitous networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925–958 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar

20. Gardner, T. S., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403, 339–342 (2000).

    Google Scholar

21. Karlebach, G. & Shamir, R. Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 770–780 (2008).

    Google Scholar

22. Holling, C. Due south. Some characteristics of uncomplicated types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398 (1959).

    Google Scholar

23. Newman, Thou. Eastward. J. Networks—An Introduction (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

    MATH  Google Scholar

24. May, R. M. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261, 459–467 (1976).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar

25. Strogatz, South. H. Nonlinear Dynamics and Anarchy with Pupil Solutions Manual: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (CRC Press, 2018).

26. Rual, J. F. et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173–1178 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar

27. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary poly peptide interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104–110 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar

28. Robinson, P. K. Enzymes: principles and biotechnological applications. Essays Biochem. 59, 1–41 (2015).

    Google Scholar

29. Wilson, H. R. & Cowan, J. D. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys. J. 12, i–24 (1972).

    ADS  Google Scholar

30. Wilson, H. R. & Cowan, J. D. A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik 13, 55–80 (1973).

    MATH  Google Scholar

31. Laurence, E., Doyon, N., Dubé, L. J. & Desrosiers, P. Spectral dimension reduction of circuitous dynamical networks. Phys. Rev. 10 ix, 011042 (2019).

    Google Scholar

32. Gould, A. Fifty. et al. Microbiome interactions shape host fitness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11951–E11960 (2018).

    Google Scholar

33. García-Bayona, 50. & Comstock, L. East. Bacterial antagonism in host-associated microbial communities. Science 361, eaat2456 (2018).

34. Willing, B. P., Russell, S. L. & Finlay, B. B. Shifting the balance: antibiotic effects on host–microbiota mutualism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 233–243 (2011).

    Google Scholar

35. Lim, R. et al. Large-calibration metabolic interaction network of the mouse and human gut microbiota. Sci. Data 7, 204 (2020).

    Google Scholar

36. Kehe, J., Ortiz, A., Kulesa, A., Gore, J., Blainey, P. C. & Friedman, J. Positive interactions are common among culturable bacteria. Sci. Adv. 7, eabi7159 (2021).

    Google Scholar

37. Levy, R. & Borenstein, Due east. Metabolic modeling of species interaction in the man microbiome elucidates community-level assembly rules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Us 110, 12804–12809 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar

38. Allee, W. C., Park, O., Emerson, A. E., Park, T. & Schmidt, Grand. P. Principles of Animal Ecology (W. B. Saunders, 1949).

39. Costello, E. Yard., Stagaman, K., Dethlefsen, L., Bohannan, B. J. & Relman, D. A. The application of ecological theory toward an agreement of the human microbiome. Science 336, 1255–1262 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar

40. Hsu, B. B. et al. Dynamic modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolome by bacteriophages in a mouse model. Prison cell Host Microbe 25, 803–814 (2019).

    Google Scholar

41. ElHage, R., Hernandez-Sanabria, E. & Van de Wiele, T. Emerging trends in 'smart probiotics': functional consideration for the development of novel health and industrial applications. Forepart. Microbiol. 8, 1889 (2017).

    Google Scholar

42. Liu, Y. Y. & Barabási, A.-L. Command principles of complex systems. Rev. Modern. Phys. 88, 035006 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar

43. Isidori, A., Sontag, E. D. and Thoma, M. Nonlinear Control Systems Vol. 3 (Springer, 1995).

44. Hermann, R. & Krener, A. Nonlinear controllability and observability. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 22, 728–740 (1977).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar

45. Whalen, A. J., Brennan, S. N., Sauer, T. D. & Schiff, S. J. Observability and controllability of nonlinear networks: the role of symmetry. Phys. Rev. 10 5, 011005 (2015).

    Google Scholar

46. Coron, J.-M. Control and Nonlinearity (American Mathematical Lodge, 2007).

47. Sontag, E. D. Mathematical Control Theory (Springer, 1998).

48. Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical assay of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. ten, 186–198 (2009).

    Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.South. acknowledges the support of the Presidential Fellowship of Bar-Ilan University, Israel, and the Mordecai and Monique Katz Graduate Fellowship Plan. This research was supported by the Israel Scientific discipline Foundation (grant nos. 499/xix and 189/nineteen), the US National Scientific discipline Foundation Well-baked award (grant no. 1735505), the Bar-Ilan Academy Data Science Found grant for enquiry on network dynamics, the ISF-NSFC joint inquiry programme (grant nos. 3132/nineteen and 3552/21), the Us–State of israel NSF–BSF programme (grant no. 2019740), the European union H2020 project RISE (grant no. 821115), the Eu H2020 projection DIT4TRAM (grant no. 953783), the Defense force Threat Reduction Bureau (DTRA grant no. HDTRA-one-19-ane-0016), the United states of america National Science Foundation (grant no. 2047488) and the Rensselaer-IBM AI Research Collaboration.

Author information

Affiliations

1. Section of Physics, Bar-Ilan Academy, Ramat-Gan, Israel

   Hillel Sanhedrai, Amir Bashan & Shlomo Havlin

2. Network Science and Technology Middle, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, United states

   Jianxi Gao

3. Section of Informatics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, Us

   Jianxi Gao

4. Department of Physics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

   Moshe Schwartz

5. Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

   Baruch Barzel

6. Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Heart, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

   Baruch Barzel

Contributions

All the authors designed the research. H.Due south. and B.B. conducted the mathematical assay. H.S. performed the numerical simulations and analysed the data. A.B. supervised the microbiome analysis. B.B. was the atomic number 82 author of the newspaper.

Respective writer

Correspondence to Baruch Barzel.

Ideals declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thank you Patrick Desrosiers and the other, bearding, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional data

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary data

Rights and permissions

About this commodity

Cite this article

Sanhedrai, H., Gao, J., Bashan, A. et al. Reviving a failed network through microscopic interventions. Nat. Phys. xviii, 338–349 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01474-y

Download citation

• Received: 25 Nov 2020

• Accepted: 19 Nov 2021

• Published: 20 January 2022

• Upshot Date: March 2022

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01474-y

Further reading

• One for all

  • Patrick Desrosiers
  • Xavier Roy-Pomerleau

  Nature Physics (2022)

What Is the Maximum Failed Google Login Attempts

DOWNLOAD HERE

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-021-01474-y

Posted by: austinreeme1983.blogspot.com